The Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati. Fascicle XVIII: Philosophy https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/philosophy <p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt;">ISSN 2784 – 2088<br>ISSN – L 1583 – 512X</p> <p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt;">Subject covered: philosophy</p> <p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt;">Contact: liviu.cocei@ugal.ro</p> Universitatea "Dunărea de Jos" din Galați en-US The Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati. Fascicle XVIII: Philosophy 1583-512X Reconcilierea dintre sacru și profan în viziunea lui Paul Tillich https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/philosophy/article/view/9648 <p>The philosopher and theologian Paul Tillich’s writings were<br>concerned with the connection between Christianity and secular culture. Thus, the <br>human person is a religious being, people’s activity has a religious significance, <br>religion is actually identified with their spiritual life, and people’s spiritual concerns <br>have a religious importance. But paradoxically, religion has found itself in the <br>strange situation of being confined to its own specific realm, different from the <br>secular one. But this weird split between the sacred and the profane will be <br>removed in the future that the Book of Revelation tells us about. Tillich highlights <br>the idea that the rupture between the sacred and the profane is neither possible nor <br>acceptable from a biblical point of view, the two realms being in a relationship of <br>harmonious interpenetration, and not of juxtaposition or opposition. Any attempt <br>to separate the secular from the sacred realm is the consequence and salient proof <br>of the deplorable situation in which the fallen man finds himself. This state of <br>division and conflict that we are currently witnessing is completely unnatural, as he <br>further argues: Paul Tillich disassociates himself equally from the extremist <br>positions of secularism and ecclesiastic imperialism. Just as he is not a supporter of <br>the divorce between the divine and the mundane, Paul Tillich also tries to find the <br>coordinates of a just relationship between religion and culture.</p> Mihai Androne ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2026-01-28 2026-01-28 15 1 5 11 Suntem pregătiți pentru persoanele non-umane? Omul, animalul și robotul https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/philosophy/article/view/9649 <p>The essay investigates the premises of the broadening of the notion of <br>“person” beyond the human species, in two converging directions: (a) the approach <br>of some animals to the “person zone” through relevant behaviors and cognitive <br>capacities; (b) the emergence of artificial entities capable of cognitive performances <br>that can rival those of humans. The argument is built around three landmarks: (1) <br>the world/Umwelt as its own mode of emergence; (2) “world” as a dynamic that <br>establishes meanings and relations; (3) the distance (historical and ontological) <br>between the meanings that animals and humans have in the world. On this basis, I <br>discuss to what extent a legal fiction of the “as if” type (in the spirit of the <br>“intentional stance”) can support the recognition of gradual forms of non-human <br>personhood. I conclude that the responsible expansion of the framework of the <br>person is possible without trivializing essential differences and without dissolving <br>humanism, although it modifies its traditional hierarchies.</p> Viorel Rotilă ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2026-01-28 2026-01-28 15 1 13 49 Aparența care spune adevărul (O analiză a raportului dintre frumos, spirit și adevăr în gândirea estetică a lui Hegel) https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/philosophy/article/view/9657 <p>Starting from Hegel’s idea that art is the place where truth takes on a sensible form, this article traces how beauty becomes the appearance through which essence becomes visible. Beauty is understood as an ontological expression of spirit, a space of reconciliation between the universal and the particular, between thought and the sensible. Art is viewed both as a means of knowledge and as an experience of lived truth, a free activity of imagination through which reality is transfigured and reveals its inner meaning. In poetry, this tension between form and content, between the finite and the infinite, finds its most authentic fulfillment. The appearance that tells the truth is, ultimately, the way in which spirit comes to recognize itself through the beauty of the world it creates.</p> Elena Grigoriu ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2026-01-28 2026-01-28 15 1 51 64 Fundamente filosofice ale artei ca joc și existență întru mister https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/philosophy/article/view/9651 <p>The study examines the philosophical foundations of art as play and <br>existence-in-mystery, as these are articulated in the philosophical work of Lucian <br>Blaga, who, in an age dominated by positivist and phenomenological thought, <br>possessed both the strength to offer the last major synthesis in universal <br>philosophy and the originality to create a metaphysical system in which poeticity <br>and aesthetics constitute decisive arguments. We attempt to show that, among <br>human experiences, art is the one in which becoming-into-being is most clearly <br>illustrated, insofar as, as processuality, beyond what it expresses as an outcome of <br>the psycho-historical reality from which it arises, it has always expressed the <br>demiurgic dimension of the human being. In other words, if the human <br>distinguishes itself from other living creatures by anything, it is precisely through <br>its demiurgic aspect, through its compulsive desire to possess everything.<br>The first part of the study reviews the concepts of existence-in-mystery, <br>plasticizing and revelatory knowledge, as well as their corresponding notions, the <br>plasticizing and revelatory metaphor, proposing—together with Plato’s theory of <br>recollection and with Noica’s reflections—a theory of the imagination–memory <br>relation.<br>Finally, we place the play–art analogy within the perspective of aesthetics <br>and within the Blagian theoretical framework thus obtained, in which art appears <br>as a space of tension between the ludic freedom of form and the structural <br>inaccessibility of being, producing a specific mode of existence that coincides <br>neither with conceptual knowledge nor with purely subjective expression, but <br>establishes, as an epiphany of being, an objectification of mystery. Art, as existence&nbsp;into mystery, is a paradoxical object of knowledge: although it belongs to this world, it concerns the metaphysical one, but from the threshold of this one.</p> Codrin Vasiloancă Smirnov ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2026-01-28 2026-01-28 15 1 65 83 Orice filosofie este o poetică (II) Principiul relativității în metapoetică https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/philosophy/article/view/9655 <p>The article argues that the major forms of knowledge-science, <br>philosophy, the sacred, and the arts-are constitute forms of poetics, that is, <br>language games that possess ontological status, whose identity is preserved <br>through conceptual deformation and regeneration. The starting point is the <br>distinction between stable and unstable thinking: science and the sacred produce <br>stability (through verification and revelation, respectively), philosophy seeks <br>stability through intellectual intuition, and poetry cultivates creative instability. <br>This architecture is connected to a formulation of the "principle of relativity in <br>thought" which is responsible for preserving the identity of the rational approach at <br>the cost of conceptual deformation and transformation, but also for diversification <br>of poetics, in any creative and instituting act, language and reality are mutually <br>born. To apply the metapoetic principle, a classical lineage of the Logos is <br>reconstructed (Parmenides, Gorgias, Heraclitus, Platonism, and Stoicism), then it <br>is shown how in modernity, the same poetics emerges as polarized around the <br>problem of nature and the preservation of the ego, of the individual.</p> Iulian Grigoriu ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2026-01-28 2026-01-28 15 1 85 108 Timon din Atena, caz clasic de maladie axiologică https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/philosophy/article/view/9656 <p>In the article Illnesses and Deficiencies of Axiological Consciousness<br>from issue 13 of this journal, I presented arguments in favor of developing <br>philosophy along the lines of a medical theory that identifies and treats axiological <br>diseases—those illnesses that originate in our deviant desiderative acts and lead us <br>to behaviors that plunge us below the threshold of human dignity. Within that <br>framework, I also emphasized that this medical objective has been sporadically and <br>intuitively pursued, among others, by moralizing artists. In the present case, we <br>seek to identify one of the axiological diseases, misanthropy, and to illustrate it <br>through the figure of Timon of Athens.</p> Ivan Ivlampie ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2026-01-28 2026-01-28 15 1 109 116