THE PERMANENT NEUTRALITY OF STATES AND INTERNATIONAL RESTRICTIVE MEASURES

Abstract

The institution of state neutrality dates back to ancient times. Since then, neutrality has been
influenced by the circumstances that have marked the evolution of international society.
However, the fundamental obligations of permanently neutral states have always been
recognized as abstention and impartiality. Abstention from any form of involvement in
armed conflict and the non-discriminatory treatment of belligerents. While abstention has,
to this day, had a well-defined legal content, with state practice being consistent on this
matter, impartiality, in light of the new challenges to state security, has sparked heated
debates among scholars.
The main goal of this scientific approach is to demonstrate the viability of the institution of
permanent neutrality of states in light of recent events on the world stage. Neutrality, in the
case of certain states, is not merely a political tool, but a legal status founded not only on the
unilateral declaration of the state, but also guaranteed by the agreement of the states that
undertake commitments to defend this status.
Contemporary international society aims to achieve the imperatives of international peace
and security. These ideals can only be achieved through the collective efforts of all
international actors, including the cooperation of permanently neutral states. As a case study
in this article, we will analyze Switzerland's participation in the process of implementing
international restrictive measures.