Workplace searches: balancing employer’s interests and employee’s fundamental right
Abstract
The article examines the issue of workplace searches from the perspective of the legal balance between the employer’s right to protect property and the obligation to respect the employee’s fundamental rights. The author analyzes the legal framework governing private security and control activities, highlighting the absence of explicit regulation regarding body and vehicle searches of employees. The study emphasizes the practical and interpretative challenges arising from this legislative gap, stressing the need for clear internal regulations based on the employee’s informed consent and the principle of proportionality between the aim pursued and the means used. The conclusion affirms that workplace searches may be legitimate only when they respect the employee’s dignity, privacy, and physical integrity—fundamental values guaranteed by the Constitution and international human rights instruments.
References
Cobăneanu S., Dumitrescu Iu.-C. Body Search. In: National Law Review, No. 9-10/2010.
Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Moldova of 14 March 2003. Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova, No. 248-251 of 5 November 2013.
Labour Code of the Republic of Moldova of 28 March 2003. Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova, No. 159-162 of 29 July 2003.
Explanatory Dictionary of the Romanian Language. [online], [cited 02.03.2026]. Available at: http://www.dex.ro/perchezi%C8%9Bie
Law No. 135/2010 on the New Code of Criminal Procedure. [online], [cited 02.03.2026]. Available at: http://www.dreptonline.ro/legislatie/codul_de_procedura_penala_legea_135_2010.php
Law No. 283 of 4 July 2003 on Private Detective and Security Activity. Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova, No. 200-203 of 19 September 2003.
Vîzdoagă D. Application of the Proportionality Test in the Conduct of Searches and the Seizure of Objects and Documents. In: Journal of the National Institute of Justice, No. 4(59)/2021.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content's originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.