Statements by the Prism of the Criminal Law

  • Andrei Nastas
  • Sergiu Cernomoret
  • Doina Cazacu
Keywords: statements; justice; veracity; truth; false statements criminal liability

Abstract

Analyzing in detail the notion of justice, it has several meanings, two of which are directly related to the study of the court system: justice is a function - the function of the judge to decide on conflicts between different subjects of law enforcement respectively, justice is all the activities which contribute, directly or indirectly, may exercise the judicial function. In fact, the primary purpose of this article, highlighting the need for protection is the accuracy of the information through the criminal rules. The problem arises when the statements of witnesses against a person narration and/or information that don’t correspond to reality. Perjury in judicio falsitas is that a witness who, in a criminal, civil, disciplinary or any other case in which listening to witnesses, making false statements, or does not say everything he knows concerning the circumstances essential to the which was asked and is prosecuted by the provisions of articles of Criminal Code.

Published
2021-10-31
How to Cite
Nastas, A., Cernomoret, S. and Cazacu, D. (2021) “Statements by the Prism of the Criminal Law”, The Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati. Legal Sciences. Fascicle XXVI, 4(1), pp. 33-44. Available at: https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/als/article/view/5786 (Accessed: 27April2024).
Section
Public Law

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.