Legal Challenges of the TikTok Platform within the European Union Framework: The Case of Albania
Abstract
In the contemporary digital landscape, social media platforms have transcended their initial purpose of facilitating personal connections, evolving into influential arenas for information dissemination, entertainment, commerce, and political engagement. This evolution underscores the necessity for comprehensive legal framework that addresses the multifaceted challenges posed by these platforms, particularly concerning user rights, content regulation, and platform accountability.
The European Union's Digital Service Act (DSA) represents a significant legislative advancement aimed at creating a safer and more transparent online environment. By imposing obligations on very large online platforms, the DSA seeks to mitigate systemic risks and ensure the protection of fundamental rights within the digital sphere.
This paper examines the legal challenges associated with the operation of TikTok within the European Union, with a specific focus on Albania's regulatory response. In early 2025, the Albanian government implemented a one-year suspension of TikTok, citing concerns over the platform's impact on youth behavior and public safety. This action has sparked a national debate on the balance between safeguarding minors and upholding freedom of expression.
Through an analysis of the existing legal frameworks and the specific measures adopted by Albania, this study explores the complexities of regulating digital platforms in a manner that protects vulnerable populations without infringing upon fundamental rights. The paper aims to provide insights into the development of balanced legal strategies that align with European standards while addressing national concerns.
References
Decision of AMA no. 128, dated 23.12.2024, approving the regulation "On the special requirements for video sharing platform providers", available at: https://ama.gov.al/ova_doc/rregullore/
Decision of Council of Ministers no. 151, dated 06.03.2025 “On taking temporary measures to avoid the negative impacts of the online platform 'TikTok'”
Hobbs, Tawnell D. et al. “The Corpse Bride Diet: How TikTok Inundates Teens with Eating-Disorder Videos”, available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-tiktok-inundates-teens-with-eating-disorder-videos-11639754848
https://akep.al/publikime/lista-e-domaineve-linkeve-per-bllokim-aksesi/
https://ama.gov.al/transparence-ama-tiktok-mbi-1200-video-te-bllokuara-per-pirateri/
https://awiebe.org/en/rabbit-hole-effect/
https://digital-services-act-whistleblower.integrityline.app/
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_6487
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_926
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_1223
https://support.tiktok.com/en/account-and-privacy/personalized-ads-and-data/commercial-content-library
https://shqiptarja.com/lajm/tiktoku-ne-shqiperi-ka-efektin-e-droges-rama-ta-heqim-kete-shok-te-keq-nga-duart-e-femijeve-te-vendosen-sanksione-mesuesja-po-bie-roli-jone
https://www.brusselstimes.com/932423/rabbit-hole-effect-european-commission-opens-formal-investigation-into-tiktok
https://www.qbz.gov.al/eli/vendim/2025/03/06/151/3585db2a-e5ab-4646-b4aa-d3f91bb1b84e;q=tiktok
Law no. 54/2024 On Electronic Communications in the Republic of Albania” available at: https://akep.al/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ligj-2024-05-30-54.pdf
Law no. 97/2013 “On the audiovisual media in the Republic of Albania”, as amended, available at: https://ama.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Ligj-nr.97-2013-Për-Mediat-Audiovizive-në-Republikën-e-Shqipërisë.pdf
Ranganathan, Nayanatara “Regulating influence, timidly”, 04 November 2022, available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/dsa-regulating-influence/
Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act), available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng
Supreme Court of the United States, January 17 2025, TikTok inc., et al., petitioners vs. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General Brian Firebaugh, et al., Petitioners vs. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, available at: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf
Teliti, E. Stasa, O. “TikTok, human rights versus government decision-making in Albania”, available at: https://digieffect.eu/tiktok-human-rights-versus-government-decision-making-in-albania

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content's originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.