Comparative Analysis of Metallic Oxides and Nanostructured Materials for Air Purification Applications

Omar AHMED; Adriana-Gabriela SCHIOPU; Mihai OPROESCU

doi:10.35219/mms.2026.3.04

Omar AHMED POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Romania
Adriana-Gabriela SCHIOPU POLITEHNICA Bucharest - Pitești University Centre, Romania
Mihai OPROESCU POLITEHNICA Bucharest- Pitești University Centre, Romania

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35219/mms.2026.3.04

Keywords: air purification, mechanism, comparative analysis, environmental applications, metallic oxides application, air quality

Abstract

Air pollution represents one of the major environmental and public health challenges worldwide, generating an increasing demand for efficient air purification technologies. Nanostructured materials have attracted significant attention due to their high surface area, enhanced reactivity, and multifunctional pollutant removal mechanisms. This paper presents a comparative analysis of metallic oxides employed in air purification applications, focusing on titanium dioxide (TiO₂), zinc oxide (ZnO), copper oxide (CuO), nickel oxide (NiO), and magnesium oxide (MgO). The fundamental purification mechanisms, including heterogeneous photocatalysis, reactive oxygen species generation, gas adsorption, and chemisorption processes, are discussed in relation to the structural and electronic properties of each material. The study evaluates the advantages and limitations of these oxides in removing volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, sulphur oxides, and biological contaminants. Furthermore, the performance of metallic oxides is compared with that of carbon-based nanomaterials and metalorganic frameworks, highlighting the benefits of hybrid nanocomposite systems. Attention is given to practical implementation challenges, such as charge carrier recombination, photocorrosion, catalyst deactivation, mass transfer limitations, formation of toxic by-products, and nanoparticle immobilization requirements. The analysis indicates that no single material can provide a universal solution for air purification; instead, future developments should focus on engineered heterojunctions and multifunctional hybrid systems capable of combining adsorption, photocatalytic degradation, and long-term operational stability. These approaches offer promising perspectives for the development of next-generation sustainable air purification technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. Ahmed O., et al., Necessity of emergent materials development for air filtration to increase air quality, 16th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), IEEE, p. 1-5, Jun. 2024.
[2]. Oproescu M., et al., Trends and Advantages in Using Nanomaterials for Air Filtration, 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), IEEE, p. 1-6, Jun. 2023.
[3]. Biloshchytskyi A., et al., Reducing Outdoor Air Pollutants through a Moss-Based Biotechnological Purification Filter in Kazakhstan, Urban Science, vol. 7, no. 4, Dec. 2023.
[4]. Kaliva M., Vamvakaki M., Nanomaterials characterization, Polymer Science and Nanotechnology: Fundamentals and Applications, p. 401-433, Jan. 2020.
[5]. Sha R., et al., ZnO nano-structured based devices for chemical and optical sensing applications, Sensors and Actuators Reports, vol. 4, p. 100098, Nov. 2022.
[6]. Liu B., Liu J., Sensors and biosensors based on metal oxide nanomaterials, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 121, p. 115690, Dec. 2019.
[7]. Ur Rehman F., et al., Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles, Characterization and Biomedical Applications in Medicinal Sciences, Characterization and Biomedical Applications in Medicinal Sciences Article in Journal of Materials Science and Surface Engineering, 2022.
[8]. Kaur A., et al., A review on template assisted synthesis of multi-functional metal oxide nanostructures: Status and prospects, Materials Science and Engineering: B, vol. 286, p. 116005, Dec. 2022.
[9]. Rahman M., et al., Conversion of n-type to p-type conductivity in ZnO by incorporation of Ag and Ag-Li, Mater. Today Commun., vol. 33, p. 104278, Dec. 2022.
[10]. Miquel-Jeanjean C., et al., Penetration Study of Formulated Nanosized Titanium Dioxide in Models of Damaged and Sun-Irradiated Skins, DOI: 10.1111.
[11]. Kong Y., et al., SnO2 nanostructured materials used as gas sensors for the detection of hazardous and flammable gases: A review, Nano Materials Sc., vol. 4, no. 4, p. 339-350, Dec. 2022.
[12]. Yang B., et al., Enhancing gas sensing performance of tungsten trioxide (WO3) nanofibers through diameter and crystallinity control, Sens. and Act. Rep., vol. 7, p. 100182, 2024.
[13]. Modan E. M., et al., Ultrasound and microwave assisted hydrolysis of nanostructured magnesium oxide for impregnation of polyester fibre filters, Bull., Series B, vol. 86, p. 2024.
[14]. Mohamed E. F., Nanotechnology: Future of Environmental Air Pollution Control, Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 429, 2017.
[15]. Garg N., et al., Exploring the Potential of Carbon Based Materials in Air Purification, MatSci Express, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 29-57, 2025.
[16]. Yan Y., et al., Novel Nanomaterials for Indoor Air Chemical Purification: A Review, Inorganics, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 111, 2026.
[17]. Soni A., Nanotechnology and Its Implications for Controlling Air Pollution: A Mini Review, Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology Open Access, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 1-6, 2024.
[18]. Haruta M., et al., Gold catalysts prepared by coprecipitation for low-temperature oxidation of hydrogen and of carbon monoxide, J. Catal., vol. 115, no. 2, p. 301-309, 1989.
[19]. Mo J., et al., Photocatalytic purification of volatile organic compounds in indoor air: A literature review, Atmos. Environ., vol. 43, no. 14, p. 2229-2246, 2009.
[20]. Li X., et al., Exploring the photocatalytic conversion mechanism of gaseous formaldehyde degradation on TiO2–x-OV surface, J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 424, p. 127217, 2022.
[21]. Ayappan C., et al., TiO2-based photocatalysts for emerging gaseous pollutants removal: From photocatalysts to reactors design, Coord. Chem. Rev., vol. 515, 2024.
[22]. Kuk S. K., et al., Singlet-oxygen-driven photocatalytic degradation of gaseous formaldehyde and its mechanistic study, Appl. Catal. B, vol. 328, 2023.
[23]. Lahiri J., Batzill M., Surface Functionalization of ZnO Photocatalysts with Monolayer ZnS, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 11, p. 4304-4307, 2008.
[24]. Ren X., et al., Carbon nanotubes as adsorbents in environmental pollution management: A review, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 170, no. 2-3, p. 395-410, 2011.
[25]. hsin Shih Y., syue Li M., Adsorption of selected volatile organic vapors on multiwall carbon nanotubes, J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 154, no. 1-3, p. 21-28, 2008.
[26]. Wu C.-M., et al., Sulfur Dioxide Adsorption on ZnO Nanoparticles and Nanorods, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 20, p. 10164-10172, 2011.
[27]. Li X., et al., H2O2-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2-SiO2 and its enhanced photocatalytic-adsorptive desulfurization performance for model fuel, Fuel, vol. 226, p. 527-535, 2018.
[28]. Gupta V. K., Saleh T. A., Sorption of pollutants by porous carbon, carbon nanotubes and fullerene - An overview, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 20, no. 5, p. 2828-2843, 2013.
[29]. Pan B., Xing B., Adsorption mechanisms of organic chemicals on carbon nanotubes, Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 42, no. 24, p. 9005-9013, 2008.
[30]. Zhang X., et al., Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: A review, J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 338, p. 102-123, 2017.