Chargers for Blast Furnaces Double Bell vs. Rotary Chute

  • Adrian VASILIU "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati
Keywords: blast furnaces charging device, double bell vs. rotating chute

Abstract

The distribution of materials at the mouth of the loading of a furnace is decisive for its operation at optimal efficiency. For this operation using charging devices that can be of several types is useful. The paper presents a case study from ArcelorMittal Galati, the blast furnace no. 5, where a double bell charging device was changed with a type of rotating Paul Wurth channel, thereby achieving improved productivity.

Creative Commons License

References

[1]. ***, Documentation ArcelorMittal Steel Galaţi S.A., http://www.arcelormittal.sa.
[2]. Buzea O., Îndrumător furnale - Partea III, SIDEX.
[3]. Deică N., Utilizarea rațională a produselor refractare, Editura Tehnică, București, 1982.
[4]. ***, Documentation Paul Wurth, http://www.paulwurth.com.
[5]. Dobrovici D., Metalurgia fontei, Editura Tehnică, Bucureşti, 1966.
[6]. Harting W. et al., Maßnahmen, die Produktivität der Hochöfen zu erhöhen, Stahl und Eisen, Germania, no. 6, 2005.
Published
2016-12-15
How to Cite
1.
VASILIU A. Chargers for Blast Furnaces Double Bell vs. Rotary Chute. The Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati. Fascicle IX, Metallurgy and Materials Science [Internet]. 15Dec.2016 [cited 26Apr.2024];39(4):16-1. Available from: https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/mms/article/view/1221
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.