Perceived Characteristics of Materials in a Product Aesthetics Context
Abstract
Materials possess a number of objective characteristics, the values of which can be determined experimentally. On the other hand, materials also have a number of subjective characteristics, such as perceived quality, perceived performance, and so on. These perceived features are very important in constructing the product’s aesthetics. The paper presents the results of three experiments performed to determine perceived characteristics (quality, performance, durability, modernity, and aesthetics) associated with four classes of materials (metal, plastic, wood, and ceramics). Computer-designed product models were used in the experiments. All products used in the experiment were low-tech. The design was varied on three levels: minimal, elaborate, and exceptional. Differences in perception were found for each level of design. It has been found that the elaborate design improves the perception of the characteristics of the materials, but the exceptional design has a negative influence on the perception. Plastics benefit greatly from the contribution of design, while wood (traditional material) is better perceived in the case of minimal design.
References
[2]. Kutz M. (ed), Handbook of materials selection, Wiley, 2002.
[3]. Hodgson S. N. B., Harper J. F., Effective Use of Materials in The Design Process: More Than a Selection Problem, In Proceedings of E&PDE 2004, the 7th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Delft, Netherlands, 2004.
[4]. Gant N., Plastics design - the unlikely pioneer of product relationships, International Conference on the Art of Plastics Design, Berlin, 2005.
[5]. Ashby M. F., Johnson K., Materials and design: the art and science of material selection in product design. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013.
[6]. Van Kesteren I. E. H., Stappers P. J., De Bruijn J. C. M., Materials in products selection: tools for including user-interaction in materials selection, International Journal of Design, 1 (3), p. 41-55, 2007.
[7]. Karana E., How do materials obtain their meanings, METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 27(2), p. 271-285, 2010.
[8]. Karana E., Hekkert P., User-material-product interrelationships in attributing meanings, International Journal of Design, 4(3), p. 43-52, 2010.
[9]. Heskett J., Design: A Very Short Introduction, New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[10]. Lefteri C., Materials for Inspirational Design, Rotovision, 2006.
[11]. Arabe K., Materials’ Central Role in Product Personality, Industrial Market Trends (March), 2004.
[12]. Manzini E., The Material of Invention, Design Council, London, 1986.
[13]. Katz S., Plastics: Design and Materials, London: Studio Vista, 1978.
[14]. Karana E., Van Weelderen W., Van Woerden E., The effect of form on attributing meanings to materials, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, 2007.
[15]. Dumitrescu A., Researches Regarding Correlation Between Materials’ Tactile Feeling and Perceived Performance, Scientific Bulletin of Politehnica University of Bucharest, Series D, 76(1), p. 171-180, 2014.
