Sfințenia împaratului Constantin cel Mare

  • Gina Luminița Scarlat “Dunarea de Jos“ University of Galati
Keywords: cross, recovery, Constantine the Great, Romanian theology

Abstract

This study is a response to a German theologian who contested vehemently the personality of Constantine the Great because of certain actions which were considered a taboo in theology. He asked me who had the idea of sanctifying him. I replied by referral to the historical and political context, in whose absence any intercession about the emperor is futile, and by another referral to Saint Mary the Egyptian, although I could have chosen a biblical example for his power of understanding. The main idea of the study is that we can see the emperor’s personality in its integrity, without having the complex that the Church had sanctified an unsuitable person. A short presentation of how he and his faithful mother are perceived in the old Romanian theology illustrates the cult of the two saint emperors on Romanian land and their importance for the re-enforcement of our true faith.

Author Biography

Gina Luminița Scarlat, “Dunarea de Jos“ University of Galati

Lect. dr. Gina Luminița Scarlat, Facultatea de Istorie, Filosofie și Teologie, Universitatea „Dunarea de Jos“ din Galați

Published
2014-07-21
How to Cite
Scarlat, G. (2014). Sfințenia împaratului Constantin cel Mare. Teologie și Educație La "Dunărea De Jos", 12, 549-553. Retrieved from https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/teologie/article/view/4385
Section
2013 – Anul omagial al Sfinților Împărați Constantin și Elena

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.